Population Density, Developmental Period and Fecundity of Anopheles Mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) in the Gezira State, Sudan

  • Abdalla Ibrahim Abdalla Assistant Prof., Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, University of Gezira.
  • Ahmed E. M. Hassan Professor, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Gezira.
  • Mutaman A. A. Kehail Associate Prof., Faculty of Engineering and Technology, University of Gezira.

Abstract


In the Gezira State, insecticides were used for many years for controlling mosquitoes and other agricultural pests. The objective of this work was to study the population density, the developmental periods the reproductive periods and the fecundity of Anopheles mosquitoes in the Gezira State, Sudan. The study was conducted in three sites; Elmanagel, Elhosh and Wad Medani.Ten of one-day old or less of the cultured adult males and females of A. pharoensis wewe transferred separately to cage. The female pre-oviposition period, daily number of eggs deposited, the oviposition period, the post oviposition period, the adult longevity and the average number of eggs per female were recorded. The results revealed that, the number of A.arabiensis larvae collected from  the three sites was higher than that of A. pharoensis and A. funestus during the two seasons (2009 and 2010). The number of A. funestus adults collected at Wad Medani site during the two seasons was lowest than that collected from El Managel and El Hosh. The incubation period of the eggs, was relatively similar in all Anopheles species, as same as the larval period. The pupal period was relatively longer in A. funestus (2.4 days) and A. pharoensis (2.2 days) than in A.arabiensis (2 days). Adult A. pharoensis lived relatively longer (21 days) than A arabiensis and A. funestus


(20 days). The total life cycle was relatively longer (32 days) in A. pharoensis than in A. arabiensis and A. funestus (30 days for each). Females of all species of Anopheles mosquito oviposited after one day from their emergence from the pupae and took also one day before they oviposit again. The oviposition period was significantly longer in A. arabiensis (3.3 days) than in A. pharoensis (2.5 days) and A. funestus (1.8 days). The oviposition rate was significantly higher in A. arabiensis (191) than in  A. pharoensis (150) and A. funestus (79). The fecundity of A. arabiensis (624 eggs/female) was significantly greater than that of A. pharoensis (391 eggs/female) and A. funestus (141 eggs/female). Such study should be run periodically for all sites in the Gezira State and neighboring States.



 

References

Barnard, D. R. and Mulla, M. S. (2007). Effect of photo – period and temperature on blood feeding cogenesis an fat body development in the mosquito, Anopheles arabiensis. J. Insect physiol., 83:1260 – 1261.
Belkin, J. N. (2006).The mosquito of the South pacific (Diptera: Culicidae).
University of California press, Berkeley and Los Angles. Vol. 1. PP. 16-18.
BNHP (1987). Annual report. Ministry of Health, Sudan: PP 130.
Christopher, S. R. (1911). The development of the egg follicle in Anopheles. Paludism, 2: 51 - 53.
Clements, A. N. and Boocock, M. R. (1984). Ovarian development in mosquitoes:
stages of growth and arrest, and follicular resorption. Physiol. Entomol, 9: 16.
Clements, A. N. (1992). The biology of mosquito, development, nutrition and reproduction. Chapman and Hall Press, London. Vol. 1, first edition, PP 16.
El Safi, S. H.; Haridi, A. M. and El Rabaa, F. M. A. (1985). The impact of the exotic fish, Gambosia affinis (Baird and Girad) on some natural predators of immature mosquitoes. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 88: 175-178.
Gillies, M. T. (1956). The problem of exophily in Anopheles gambiae. Bull. WHO, 15: 466-471.
Gillies, M. T. and Demillion, R. (1968). Key for Anopheles mosquitoes identification . Medical Entomology Section – National laboratory for Public Health, Khartoum
Haridi, A. M. (1972). Linkage studies on DDT and Aldrin resistance in species A and B of Anopheles gambia complex. Bull. WHO, 47: 619-626.
Hawking, P. (1973). The distribution of human filariasis throughout the world. WHO. Geneva, WHO/FLL/73:114.
Jan, A. (1997). Vector control, methods for use by individuals and communities – Rozendaal World Health Organization, Geneva. Vol. (3): PP. 16-18.
Perry, A. S. and Agosin, M. (1974). The physiology of insects. Vol. 6 (Rochstinm M. ed.,) Academic Press, New York: 33-41.
Schaefer, C. H.; Miura, T. and Wahsino, R. K. (2007). Studies on the over wintering biology of natural population of Anopheles mosquito in California. Mosq. News, 81: 133- 137.
Service, M. W. (1988). Mortality of the immature stages of species B of the Anopheles gambiae complex in Kenya: Comparison between rice fields and temporary pools, identification of predators and effect of insecticidal spraying, J. Med. Entomol., 13(4.5): 535-541.
Steffen, W. A. (2011). The rate of development of Anopheles mosquito of vockeroth in field and laboratory. Mosq. News, 134: 283-285.
Stewart, W. W. A. (1974). Biology and larvae development of Anopheles mosquitoes. Med. Hyg., 61: 65-68.
Tesfa-Yohanna, T. M. (1982). Reproductive biology of Anopheles mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Med. Entomol., 19: 29-30.
Wattal, B. L. and Kalra, N. L. (1960). Studies on culicinae mosquitoes -1- preferential indoor resting habits of Anopheles funestus. Indian J. Malar., 14: 605 – 606.
White, G. B. (1989). Mosquito – borne virus diseases. WHO/VBC89-967: 2-13.
White, G. B. (1991). Anopheles mosquito, in Mansobahr. Manso's Tropical Diseases, London, Vol. (19): PP. 1424-1434.
Published
2017-06-01
How to Cite
ABDALLA, Abdalla Ibrahim; E. M. HASSAN, Ahmed; A. A. KEHAIL, Mutaman. Population Density, Developmental Period and Fecundity of Anopheles Mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) in the Gezira State, Sudan. Gezira Journal of Health Sciences, [S.l.], v. 13, n. 1, june 2017. ISSN 1810-5386. Available at: <http://journals.uofg.edu.sd/index.php/gjhs/article/view/1012>. Date accessed: 21 feb. 2019.
Section
Articles