Fetal Binocular Distance in Sudanese, Sono-graphic Study

  • Ammar Mohammed Ali Mohammed Fadol Department of anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, International University of Africa
  • Qurashi Mohammed Ali Department of anatomy, Faculty of Medicine,, The National University - Sudan, Khartoum, Sudan
  • Abbas Elnour Hamza Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Alzaeim Alazhari University, Khartoum North, Sudan

Abstract

Background: Recent developments in fetal ultrasound technology represent effective tools for gestation age (GA) estimation and screening of abnormalities in fetal development. Fetal orbital measurements as well as binocular distance (BOD) not performed routinely during obstetrical sono-graphy, although not very popular, can aid in GA and fetal weight (FW) estimation. Objectives: The aim of this study was to construct reference ranges for fetal BOD in Sudan, and to evaluate the correlations of BOD with GA, FW, sex, and other common biometric measurements. Subjects and methods: In this prospective, descriptive, cross sectional study, a total of 385 Sudanese healthy pregnant ladies with regular menstrual cycle and certainty about the time of the last menstrual period and age ranged of 16 – 44 years, within 14 to 41 weeks of gestation; individuals underwent routine sono-graphy were examined at obstetrics and gynecology clinic in Omdurman, Sudan. Normal pregnancies of viable singleton with good sono-graphic visualization of the fetus face were included in this study. Moreover, descriptive statistics, linear regression models were employed by using SPSS version 22 (SPSS Inc, IBM) at 95% confidence intervals. Results: Fetal BOD range (15 - 64 mm),mean (40.1 ± 10.7 mm). Linear growth functions were significant between BOD with GA (r=0.930, P < 0.0001), FW (r=0.801, P < 0.0001) and other common fetal biometric parameters such as biparietal diameter (r=0.935, P < 0.0001), head circumference (r=0.879, P < 0.0001), femur length (r=0.939, P < 0.0001) and abdominal circumference (r=0.701, P < 0.0001). Furthermore, BOD showed significant correlation with both fetal sex (P = 0.021) and mother’s tribe (P = 0.023). Conclusion: BOD significantly increased with increasing GA. Reference ranges developed in the present study will enable accurate evaluation of menstrual age throughout pregnancy. However, nomograms of BOD for Sudanese fetuses of 14–41 weeks gestation have been constructed.

References

1. Tomasik E, Czepita D, Zejmo M et al. Development of the human eyeball and orbit during the fetal life. In Annales Academiae Medicae Stetinensis; 2004. 37-40 p.
2. Denis D, Burguiere O, Burillon C. A biometric study of the eye, orbit, and face in 205 normal human fetuses. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 1998; 39:2232-8.
3. Sforza C, Elamin F, Tommasi DG et al. Morphometry of the soft tissues of the orbital region in northern sudanese persons. Forensic science international, 2013; 228 (1):180. e1-. e11.
4. Merz E, Wellek S, Püttmann S et al. [orbital diameter, inner and outer orbital distance. A growth model of fetal orbital measurements]. Ultraschall in der Medizin (Stuttgart, Germany: 1980), 1995; 16 (1):12-7.
5. Jeanty P, Clavelli W, Romaris S. Ultrasound detection of chromosomal anomalies. Sonography in Obstetrics and Gynecology Priciples and Practice. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2001:583-613.
6. Sukonpan K, Phupong V. Fetal ocular distance in normal pregnancies. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand= Chotmaihet thangphaet, 2008; 91 (9):1318-22.
7. Tongsong T, Wanapirak C, Jesadapornchai S et al. Fetal binocular distance as a predictor of menstrual age. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1992; 38 (2):87-91.
8. Trout T, Budorick NE, Pretorius DH et al. Significance of orbital measurements in the fetus. Journal of ultrasound in medicine, 1994; 13 (12):937-43.
9. Rosati P, Guariglia L. Early transvaginal fetal orbital measurements a screening tool for aneuploidy? Journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2003; 22 (11):1201-5.
10. Mashiach R, Vardimon D, Kaplan B et al. Early sonographic detection of recurrent fetal eye anomalies. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology, 2004; 24 (6):640-3.
11. Dudea SM. Ultrasonography of the eye and orbit. Med Ultrason, 2011; 13 (2):171-4.
12. Ukoha U, Egwu O, Okafor I et al. International journal of biological & medical research. Int J Biol Med Res, 2011; 2 (3):688-90.
13. Singh K. Fetal face. Donald School Journal of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2010; 4 (4):349-60.
14. Mayden KL, Tortora M, Berkowitz RL et al. Orbital diameters: A new parameter for prenatal diagnosis and dating. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1982; 144 (3):289-97.
15. Kivilevitch Z, Salomon L, Benoit B et al. Fetal interlens distance: Normal values during pregnancy. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2010; 36 (2):186-90.
16. Tsai PY, Chen HC, Huang HH et al. A new automatic algorithm to extract craniofacial measurements from fetal three‐dimensional volumes. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2012; 39 (6):642-7.
17. Haas A, Weiglein A, Faschinger C et al. Fetal development of the human orbit. Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology, 1993; 231 (4):217-20.
18. Guariglia L, Rosati P. Early transvaginal biometry of fetal orbits: A cross-sectional study. Fetal diagnosis and therapy, 2002; 17 (1):42-7.
19. Rajlakshmi C. Correlation between fetal orbital biometry and gestational age. Journal of Anatomical Society of India, 2012; 61 (2):250-3.
20. Pommier S, Adalian P, Gaudart J et al. Fetal age estimation using orbital measurements: 3d ct‐scan study including the effects of trisomy 21. Journal of forensic sciences, 2009; 54 (1):7-12.
21. Rosati P, Bartolozzi F, Guariglia L. Reference values of fetal orbital measurements by transvaginal scan in early pregnancy. Prenatal diagnosis, 2002; 22 (10):851-5.
22. Salpou D, Kiserud T, Rasmussen S et al. Fetal age assessment based on 2nd trimester ultrasound in africa and the effect of ethnicity. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2008; 8.
23. Jacquemyn Y, Sys SU, Verdonk P. Fetal binocular distance. Gynecologic and obstetric investigation, 2000; 50 (1):24-7.
24. Clarren SK, Chudley AE, Wong L et al. Normal distribution of palpebral fissure lengths in canadian school age children. Can J Clin Pharmacol, 2010; 17 (1):e67-e78.
25. Oyinbo C, Fawehinmi H, Dare N et al. Normal inner and outer measurements of the ijaws of southern nigeria. Eur. J. Sci. Res, 2008; 22 (2):163-7.
26. Roth P, Roth A, Clerc-Bertin F et al. [prenatal ultrasonic measurements of the eye and the interorbital distance]. Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction, 1999; 28 (4):343-51.
27. Benso CY, Denis D, Adalian P et al. A biometric study of the orbit in 88 normal human fetuses. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2002; 43 (13):210-.
28. Gupta T, Kapoor K, Singh B et al. Fetal orbital and ocular biometry at different gestational ages. Journal of the Anatomical Society of India, 2013; 62 (2):157-65.
29. Royston P, Wright E. Goodness‐of‐fit statistics for age‐specific reference intervals. Statistics in medicine, 2000; 19 (21):2943-62.
30. Efrat Z, Akinfenwa O, Nicolaides K. First‐trimester determination of fetal gender by ultrasound. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology, 1999; 13 (5):305-7.
31. Melamed N, Meizner I, Mashiach R et al. Fetal sex and intrauterine growth patterns. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2013; 32 (1):35-43.
32. Schwärzler P, Bland J, Holden D et al. Sex‐specific antenatal reference growth charts for uncomplicated singleton pregnancies at 15–40 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology, 2004; 23 (1):23-9.
Published
2022-02-03
How to Cite
FADOL, Ammar Mohammed Ali Mohammed; ALI, Qurashi Mohammed; HAMZA, Abbas Elnour. Fetal Binocular Distance in Sudanese, Sono-graphic Study. Gezira Journal of Health Sciences, [S.l.], v. 17, n. 1, p. 1-12, feb. 2022. ISSN 1810-5386. Available at: <http://journals.uofg.edu.sd/index.php/gjhs/article/view/1571>. Date accessed: 04 dec. 2022.
Section
Articles