Evaluation and Outcome of Acute Scrotum at Gezira National Center of Pediatric Surgery and Gezira Hospital for Renal Diseases and Surgery; January 2009 to July 2012

  • Loui Eltayeb Mustafa MBBS, Juba University (2003), residence doctor of general surgery (SMSB)
  • Fiasal Abd Elgalil Nugud MD, Associate prof. of Pediatric Surgery, University of Gezira
  • Mustafa Omran Mansur MD Associate prof of Urology, University of Gezira

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the clinical presentation, causes, management and outcome of patients who presented with clinical aspect of acute scrotum.


Material and methods:  A total of 72 patients aged from one day to adulthood period hospitalized with acute scrotum were included in the study. Most of patients underwent surgical exploration of the scrotum, and the medical records were revised to obtain information regarding operative findings and post-operative complications.  


Results: The different common causes of acute scrotal pain were testicular torsion (27.8%), epididymo-orchitis (20.8%), and torsion of testicular appendix (19.4%). The most common age group affected by the disease is between 10 and 20 years (37.5%). Approximately two-thirds of patients presented late after 24 hours of onset of pain (61.1%), and (9.2%) developed post-operative complications.


Conclusion: Generally, children and teenagers are more likely to be affected by scrotal conditions, and most patients presented late. Testicular torsion was the most common and most serious condition which must be identified early without delay to prevent testicular damage. Any patient suspected to have testicular torsion must be subjected immediately to scrotal exploration. Post-operative complications were low.

References

1. William CS. Acute scrotal pathology. Surg. CIN. America 1982; 62(6): 955-970.
2. Cass AS, Cass BP, Veraragbavan K. Immediate exploration of the unilateral acute scrotum in young male subjects. J Urol 1980; 124: 829-832.
3. Doehn C, Fornara P, Kausch I, Buttner H, Friedrich HJ, Jocham D, Value of acute phase proteins in the differential diagnosis of acute scrotum. Eur Urol 2001; 39: 215-221.
4. Karmazyn B. Steinberg R, Kornreich L,etal (March200
5. Trojlan TH, Lishnak TS, Heiman D (April 2009), epididymitis and orchitis an overview, AM fam physician; 79 (7): 583-7.
6. Edelsberg JS, Surh YS (August 1988). “The acute scrotum” Emerg med clin North AM 6 (3): 521-46.
7. African Journals on line (AJOL), Acute scrotum in children and the role of early exploration, Queen Rania Children Hospital, King Hussein Medical Centre, Amman , Jordon. 8. Gale JSLE (February1999), “Diagnosis and treatment of the acute scrotum”. American Family Physician, 59 (4): 817-24.
9. Lam WW, Yap TL, Jacobsen AS, Teo HJ. Color Doppler Ultrasonography replacing surgical exploration for acute scrotum: myth or reality? Journal club. March 17, 2005.
Published
2014-06-01
How to Cite
MUSTAFA, Loui Eltayeb; NUGUD, Fiasal Abd Elgalil; OMRAN MANSUR, Mustafa. Evaluation and Outcome of Acute Scrotum at Gezira National Center of Pediatric Surgery and Gezira Hospital for Renal Diseases and Surgery; January 2009 to July 2012. Gezira Journal of Health Sciences, [S.l.], v. 10, n. 1, june 2014. ISSN 1810-5386. Available at: <http://journals.uofg.edu.sd/index.php/gjhs/article/view/338>. Date accessed: 28 nov. 2020.
Section
Articles